Projects
· Web automation
Unified web automation platform
Consolidating multiple Selenium / Playwright suites into a single, maintainable platform that teams actually trust for releases.
Context & challenges
Multiple teams, multiple frameworks, and regressions nobody wanted to run.
- Separate Selenium and Playwright suites existed per product, each with different conventions and levels of maintenance.
- Test runs were long and flaky, so teams only ran them for “big” releases — and incidents still slipped through.
- No central view of coverage or pass/fail history across journeys, so leaders couldn’t use results confidently.
Approach & architecture
Treat automation as a product, not a by-product.
- Defined golden journeys for web — sign-up, login, search, cart, checkout, key forms — as the backbone.
- Standardised a single automation stack with shared page objects, helpers and patterns across squads.
- Introduced tiers of suites (smoke, sanity, full regression) mapped to CI stages and environments.
-
Added tags (e.g.
@payments,@critical) to enable targeted runs when only certain modules changed.
Tooling, CI and reporting
Making it visible, fast and reliable enough for engineers to care.
- Integrated smoke suites into pull-request checks, with regression runs on main branches and pre-prod.
- Added retry logic & smart waits to sensitive flows without hiding genuine issues.
- Pushed results into dashboards (trend of pass rate, duration, flaky tests) that were reviewed in stand-ups.
- Introduced a simple “test ownership” model — each critical journey had a clear squad owning its stability.
Impact & what I’d repeat
Pragmatic automation that teams actually use and improve.
- Regression became a standard part of the release pipeline, rather than a manual, “best effort” checklist.
- Teams gained confidence to ship more frequently because critical web journeys were always covered.
- New products plugged into the platform instead of starting from scratch, shortening time-to-automation.